[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [git patches] libata updates, GPG signed (but see admin notes)
> The main worry is Linus ($human_who_pulls) gets
> cryptographically-verified data at the time he pulls. Once Linus
> republishes his tree (git push), there will be few, if any, wanting to
> verify Jeff Garzik's signature.
> So no, I don't see that as a _driving_ need in the kernel's case.
> And IMO the kernel will be a mix of signed and unsigned content for a
> while, possibly forever.

I think the desire is to be able to deconstruct things if things were to
go wrong.


H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-11-01 01:45    [W:0.141 / U:5.520 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site