[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: lockdep recursive locking detected (rcu_kthread / __cache_free)
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 15:46 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > The first lock was acquired here in an RCU callback. The later lock that
> > lockdep complained about appears to have been acquired from a recursive
> > call to __cache_free(), with no help from RCU. This looks to me like
> > one of the issues that arise from the slab allocator using itself to
> > allocate slab metadata.
> Right. However, this is a false positive since the slab cache with
> the metadata is different from the slab caches with the slab data. The slab
> cache with the metadata does not use itself any metadata slab caches.

Sure, but we're supposed to have annotated that.. see

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-03 23:09    [W:0.045 / U:9.796 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site