[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] coredump: wait on the core pattern umh at least once
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Neil Horman <> wrote:

> Seems reasonable to me.
> Acked-by: Neil Horman <>

One thing I'm not sure about is whether this will work if there are
actually no readers really reading, just the incremented one. It
seemed to work just fine in testing, but I'd be more comfortable if
someone else could confirm.


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-28 23:19    [W:0.184 / U:1.208 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site