Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 27 Oct 2011 08:13:04 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinmux: Unify pin type from signed to unsigned. | From | Belisko Marek <> |
| |
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:06 PM, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote: > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Marek Belisko wrote: > >> diff --git a/include/linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h b/include/linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h >> index 3605e94..34c33c7 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h >> +++ b/include/linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h >> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ struct pinctrl_desc { >> extern struct pinctrl_dev *pinctrl_register(struct pinctrl_desc *pctldesc, >> struct device *dev, void *driver_data); >> extern void pinctrl_unregister(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev); >> -extern bool pin_is_valid(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, int pin); >> +extern bool pin_is_valid(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin); >> extern void pinctrl_add_gpio_range(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, >> struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range); >> extern void pinctrl_remove_gpio_range(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, >> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ extern void *pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev); >> >> >> /* Sufficiently stupid default function when pinctrl is not in use */ >> -static inline bool pin_is_valid(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, int pin) >> +static inline bool pin_is_valid(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin) >> { >> return pin >= 0; >> } > > > So this would just become return true, right? Right I've overlooked it. Will send update version. >
thanks,
marek
-- as simple and primitive as possible ------------------------------------------------- Marek Belisko - OPEN-NANDRA Freelance Developer
Ruska Nova Ves 219 | Presov, 08005 Slovak Republic Tel: +421 915 052 184 skype: marekwhite twitter: #opennandra web: http://open-nandra.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |