lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] TTY: pty, fix pty counting in "/proc/sys/kernel/pty/nr"
Greg KH wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 01:48:35PM +0400, Ilya Zykov wrote:
>> Regression for commit: 24d406a6bf736f7aebdc8fa0f0ec86e0890c6d24
>> Commit: 24d406a6b accepted in Linux 3.1.
>> Disscussed on linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "subject: [PATCH] TTY: pty, fix pty counting"
>> and not accepted.
>> Although, I think it's clear.
>
> Ilya, is there some reason you are ignoring the tty maintainer and
> sending these to Linus directly? These patches need to be tested in
> linux-next, so at the earliest, they can be merged into Linus's tree for
> 3.3, they are NOT 3.2 material, especially given that they are not even
> accepted by the current tty developers.
>
> So please work with us, and don't try to circumvent the existing
> process, it is not the way we work here.
>
> Especially as this specific patch was already rejected, for very good
> reasons, why are you ignoring those reasons?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>


OK, I understand you rules.
But I don't understand, what for, you accept patch(commit: 24d406a6bf736f7aebdc8fa0f0ec86e0890c6d24),
where "pty" call tty_driver_remove_tty(), only for invoke its own route(pty_unix98_remove).

Thank you.
Ilya.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-27 15:09    [W:0.048 / U:0.632 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site