Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:07:20 +0400 | From | Ilya Zykov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] TTY: pty, fix pty counting in "/proc/sys/kernel/pty/nr" |
| |
Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 01:48:35PM +0400, Ilya Zykov wrote: >> Regression for commit: 24d406a6bf736f7aebdc8fa0f0ec86e0890c6d24 >> Commit: 24d406a6b accepted in Linux 3.1. >> Disscussed on linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "subject: [PATCH] TTY: pty, fix pty counting" >> and not accepted. >> Although, I think it's clear. > > Ilya, is there some reason you are ignoring the tty maintainer and > sending these to Linus directly? These patches need to be tested in > linux-next, so at the earliest, they can be merged into Linus's tree for > 3.3, they are NOT 3.2 material, especially given that they are not even > accepted by the current tty developers. > > So please work with us, and don't try to circumvent the existing > process, it is not the way we work here. > > Especially as this specific patch was already rejected, for very good > reasons, why are you ignoring those reasons? > > thanks, > > greg k-h >
OK, I understand you rules. But I don't understand, what for, you accept patch(commit: 24d406a6bf736f7aebdc8fa0f0ec86e0890c6d24), where "pty" call tty_driver_remove_tty(), only for invoke its own route(pty_unix98_remove).
Thank you. Ilya.
| |