[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] kvm hypervisor : Add two hypercalls to support pv-ticketlock
On 10/26/2011 04:04 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 08:24 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
CCing Ryan also
>> So then do also you foresee the need for directed yield at some point,
>> to address LHP? provided we have good improvements to prove.
> Doesn't this patchset completely eliminate lock holder preemption?
Basically I was curious whether we can do more better with your directed
yield discussions in .

I felt we can get little more improvement with doing directed yield to
lock-holder in case of LHP than sleeping. But I may be wrong.

So wanted to get the feedback, on whether I am thinking in right

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-26 21:11    [W:0.049 / U:6.676 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site