[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] kvm hypervisor : Add two hypercalls to support pv-ticketlock
    On 10/26/2011 04:04 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
    > On 10/25/2011 08:24 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
    CCing Ryan also
    >> So then do also you foresee the need for directed yield at some point,
    >> to address LHP? provided we have good improvements to prove.
    > Doesn't this patchset completely eliminate lock holder preemption?
    Basically I was curious whether we can do more better with your directed
    yield discussions in .

    I felt we can get little more improvement with doing directed yield to
    lock-holder in case of LHP than sleeping. But I may be wrong.

    So wanted to get the feedback, on whether I am thinking in right

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-10-26 21:11    [W:0.027 / U:166.692 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site