| Date | Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:02:31 -0700 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 22/55] rcu: Add grace-period, quiescent-state, and call_rcu trace events |
| |
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 06:33:53PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 11:00:16AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > From: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> > > > > Add trace events to record grace-period start and end, quiescent states, > > CPUs noticing grace-period start and end, grace-period initialization, > > call_rcu() invocation, tasks blocking in RCU read-side critical sections, > > tasks exiting those same critical sections, force_quiescent_state() > > detection of dyntick-idle and offline CPUs, CPUs entering and leaving > > dyntick-idle mode (except from NMIs), CPUs coming online and going > > offline, and CPUs being kicked for staying in dyntick-idle mode for too > > long (as in many weeks, even on 32-bit systems). > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > > rcu: Add the rcu flavor to callback trace events > > > > The earlier trace events for registering RCU callbacks and for invoking > > them did not include the RCU flavor (rcu_bh, rcu_preempt, or rcu_sched). > > This commit adds the RCU flavor to those trace events. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Did you intend for this commit message to contain two full commit > messages, and three signoffs from you?
No, messed up a rebase. <red face>
> Also, the subject doesn't seem to cover the second half of the commit > message.
This is indeed the first set of trace events where the name of the RCU flavor was important.
Thanx, Paul
|