lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/7] writeback: requeue_io_wait() on blocked inode
On Thu 20-10-11 23:22:46, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Use requeue_io_wait() if inode is somehow blocked.
>
> CC: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> CC: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

Honza

> ---
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- linux-next.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c 2011-10-20 22:42:25.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/fs/fs-writeback.c 2011-10-20 22:43:42.000000000 +0800
> @@ -471,25 +471,25 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *ino
> /*
> * slice used up: queue for next turn
> */
> requeue_io(inode, wb);
> } else {
> /*
> * Writeback blocked by something other than
> * congestion. Delay the inode for some time to
> * avoid spinning on the CPU (100% iowait)
> * retrying writeback of the dirty page/inode
> * that cannot be performed immediately.
> */
> - redirty_tail(inode, wb);
> + requeue_io_wait(inode, wb);
> }
> } else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) {
> /*
> * Filesystems can dirty the inode during writeback
> * operations, such as delayed allocation during
> * submission or metadata updates after data IO
> * completion.
> *
> * For the latter case it is very important to give
> * the inode another turn on b_more_io instead of
> * redirtying it. Constantly moving dirtied_when
> * forward will prevent us from ever writing out
>
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-21 01:35    [W:0.090 / U:0.772 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site