Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:04:37 +0400 | From | Cyrill Gorcunov <> | Subject | Re: [patch 5/5] elf: Add support for loading ET_CKPT files |
| |
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 08:56:45AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: ... > > > > IMHO, this is a fundamentally broken approach which isn't even > > > necessary. So, FWIW, NACK. > > > > It's a pity :( Anyway, as I stated above, we'll try to compare two > > real implementations, not abstract assumptions. > > Given the state of this thread, I'm pretty skeptical this one can > survive but, hey, who knows? >
Nope, if it eventually appear to be better -- there will be no point to continue keeping elfism, and back, if it end up in bunch of levers are to be injected into kernel, then definitely tuning up elf more will be a winner. It's development process after all :) I'm working on seized-restore atm, once I have something to show -- will ping you.
Cyrill
| |