[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/5] regulator: helper routine to extract regulator_init_data
    On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:48:58AM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
    > >Let's look at mc13892-regulator driver. There are 23 regulators defined
    > >in array mc13892_regulators. Needless to say, there is a dev behind
    > >mc13892-regulator driver. And when getting probed, this driver will
    > >call regulator_register() to register those 23 regulators individually.
    > >That said, for non-dt world, we have 1 + 23 'dev' with that 1 as the
    > >parent of all other 23 'dev' (wrapped by regulator_dev). But with the
    > >current DT implementation, we will have at least 1 + 23 * 2 'dev'.
    > >These extra 23 'dev' is totally new with DT.
    > >
    > but thats only because the mc13892-regulator driver is implemeted in
    > such a way that all the regulators on the platform are bundled in as
    > *one* device.

    I did not look into too many regulator drivers, but I expect this is
    way that most regulator drivers are implemented in. Having
    mc13892-regulator being probed 23 times to register these 23 regulators
    just makes less sense to me.

    > It would again depend on how you would pass these from
    > the DT, if you indeed stick to the same way of bundling all regulators
    > as one device from DT, the mc13892-regulator probe would just get called
    > once and there would be one device associated, no?
    Yes, I indeed would stick to the same way of bundling the registration
    of all regulators with mc13892-regulator being probed once. The problem
    I have with the current regulator core DT implementation is that it
    assumes the device_node of rdev->dev (dev wrapped in regulator_dev) is
    being attached to rdev->dev.parent rather than itself. Back to
    mc13892-regulator example, that said, it requires the dev of
    mc13892-regulator have the device_node of individual regulator attached
    to. IOW, the current implementation forces mc13892-regulator to be
    probed 23 times to register those 23 regulators. This is wrong to me.


     \ /
      Last update: 2011-10-20 08:05    [W:0.022 / U:51.404 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site