[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] sched/kthread: Complain loudly when others violate our flags
    On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:27:45AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > There is no correctness issue what so ever with those, and userspace
    > moving them about doesn't matter one whit.

    I wanted to make it consistent and disallow diddling wq worker
    affinity from userland. As those workers are shared and managed
    dynamically, it didn't make sense to allow affinity manipulation.
    That said, it might make sense allowing control over affinity of
    unbound wq workers for things like cpu isolation. Userspace doing
    that per-worker doesn't make whole lot of sense. Allowing putting
    unbound workers automatically into a cpuset would work better, I



     \ /
      Last update: 2011-10-03 03:25    [W:0.041 / U:2.772 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site