lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCHv4] DMAEngine: Define interleaved transfer request api
    From
    On 18 October 2011 23:05, Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
    >
    > However, Jassi's suggestion that we redefine dma_addr_t to be 64-bit
    > for just the DMA engine code is utterly insane and unworkable.  We
    > can't have typedefs which change depending on which bits of code are
    > being built, potentially changing the layout of structures being passed
    > around inside the kernel.
    >
    I am not sure you understood what I meant.
    When I said
    "Perhaps simply change dma_addr_t to u64 in dmaengine.h alone"
    I meant
    s/dma_addr_t/u64
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-10-18 19:55    [W:0.020 / U:149.288 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site