[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] cgroups: use sighand lock instead of tasklist_lock in cgroup_attach_proc
Hi Ben,

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 08:31:15PM -0400, Ben Blum wrote:
> Use sighand lock instead of tasklist_lock in cgroup_attach_proc.

Could you please feed more the changelog to explain the reason of
the change? Well, the reason of converting tasklist_lock based locking to
something more granular is almost obvious these days, but
it would be nice to know why it is safe to do so. And what exactly
that protects.


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-14 14:19    [W:0.127 / U:15.944 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site