lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 0/8] Request for inclusion: tcp memory buffers
From
Date
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:05:58 +0400, Glauber Costa said:
> On 10/14/2011 12:00 AM, David Miller wrote:

> > Make this evaluate into exactly the same exact code stream we have
> > now when the memory cgroup feature is not in use, which will be the
> > majority of users.
>
> What exactly do you mean by "not in use" ? Not compiled in or not
> actively being exercised ? If you mean the later, I appreciate tips on
> how to achieve it.
>
> Also, I kind of dispute the affirmation that !cgroup will encompass
> the majority of users, since cgroups is being enabled by default by
> most vendors. All systemd based systems use it extensively, for instance.

Yes, systemd requires a kernel that includes cgroups. However, systemd does
*not* require the memory cgroup feature. As a practical matter, if your patch
doesn't generate equivalent code for the "have cgroups, but no memory cgroup"
situation, it's a non-starter.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-14 05:01    [W:0.108 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site