lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC V3 2/8] stop_machine: make stop_machine safe and efficient to call early

* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:

> On 10/10/2011 12:34 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:18:03 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> >>> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
> >>>
> >>> Make stop_machine() safe to call early in boot, before stop_machine()
> >>> has been set up, by simply calling the callback function directly if
> >>> there's only one CPU online.
> >> Not that you need this, since it's >90% Tejun's code now, but:
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> > hey, extra review is always useful.
> >
> > Jeremy, Tejun, what's the expected merge path of these changes?
>
> Andrew has already picked up the stop_machine patch, I think. But it's
> pretty settled now, so it shouldn't cause any problem if it gets via
> multiple paths.
>
> What about the jump-label stuff? Has that been going via tip.git in the
> past, or by some other path?

If it has Jason's and PeterZ's ack then it can go via any other tree
in this cycle - we are not carrying jump label patches right now.

But those acks are very much desired.

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-12 09:39    [W:0.053 / U:0.376 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site