[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: [PATCH -v2 -mm] add extra free kbytes tunable
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Satoru Moriya wrote:

> > I think the point was that extra_free_kbytes needs to be tuned to
> > cover at least the amount of memory of the largest allocation burst
> Right. In enterprise area, we strictly test the system we build
> again and again before we release it. In that situation, we can
> set extra_free_kbytes appropriately based on system's requirements
> and/or specifications etc.

You would also need to guarantee that min_free_kbytes isn't subsequently
changed because that would change the value that extra_free_kbytes would
need to preserve the same exclusive access to memory that the rt threads
would have without increasing it.

> I understand what you concern. But in some area such as banking,
> stock exchange, train/power/plant control sysemts etc this kind
> of tunable is welcomed because they can tune their systems at
> their own risk.

You haven't tried the patch that increases the priority of kswapd when
such a latency sensitive thread triggers background reclaim?

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-13 02:03    [W:0.127 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site