[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: [PATCH -v2 -mm] add extra free kbytes tunable
On 10/11/2011 04:54 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:23:22 -0400
> Satoru Moriya <> wrote:
>> Also, if we increase the free-page reserves a.k.a min_free_kbytes,
>> the possibility of direct reclaim on other workloads increases.
>> I think it's a bad side effect.
> extra_free_kbytes has the same side-effect.

I don't think so. If we make low watermark bigger to increase
free-page reserves by extra_free_kbytes, the possibility of
direct reclaim on other workload does not increase directly
because min watermark is not changed.
Of course, as David pointed out, other workloads may incur
a regression because kswapd uses more cpu time.


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-12 23:11    [W:0.071 / U:1.656 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site