[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] x86/microcode: support for microcode update in Xen dom0
On 10/12/2011 03:16 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 08:40:05PM -0400, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> Ping?
>> On 09/26/2011 11:17 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <>
>>> Hi all,
>>> I'm proposing this for the next merge window v3.2.
>>> I originally posted this early this year, and it prompted a debate
>>> about what the "proper" way that Linux should do microcode updates,
>>> with the general concensus being "earlier", ideally in the bootloader
>>> (or in the case of Xen, as the hypervisor boots before starting any
>>> domains). However, as far as I know there has been no progress along
>>> those lines.
> Err,
> wait a sec, last time the suggestion was that _because_ xen supports the
> multiboot protocol, implementing an early solution would be even easier
> for you:
> Why would a xen microcode solution would even be contingent on how
> upstream Linux solves it (and when)?
> AFAICT, you want to hand off the microcode image from the bootloader to
> the hypervisor and update ucode there - no need for dom0 changes...

I don't want a Xen-specific solution to this. If Linux overall moves to
a boot-time microcode loading scheme, then I'm happy to support it. But
in the meantime, I want a Xen system to Just Work in the same manner as
a non-Xen one, without requiring special support from all the distros.


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-12 17:41    [W:0.057 / U:3.440 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site