lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: big picture UDP/IP performance question re 2.6.18 -> 2.6.32
    On 10/06/2011 11:40 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
    > Le jeudi 06 octobre 2011 à 23:27 -0400, starlight@binnacle.cx a écrit :

    >> If the older kernels are switching to NAPI
    >> for much of surge and the switching out
    >> once the pulse falls off, it might
    >> conceivably result in much better latency
    >> and overall performance.

    > Thats exactly the opposite : Your old kernel is not fast enough to
    > enter/exit NAPI on every incoming frame.
    >
    > Instead of one IRQ per incoming frame, you have less interrupts :
    > A napi run processes more than 1 frame.
    >
    > Now increase your incoming rate, and you'll discover a new kernel will
    > be able to process more frames without losses.

    I wonder if it would make sense to adjust the interrupt mitigation
    parameters in the NIC to allow it to accumulate a few packets before
    interrupting the CPU. We had good luck using this to reduce interrupt
    rate on a quasi-pathological case where we were bouncing in and out of
    NAPI because we were *just* fast enough to keep up with incoming packets.

    Chris



    --
    Chris Friesen
    Software Developer
    GENBAND
    chris.friesen@genband.com
    www.genband.com
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-10-11 18:27    [W:0.029 / U:62.556 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site