[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RESEND PATCH v3 0/2] Pass resources to pci_create_bus() and fix MIPS PCI resources
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Deng-Cheng Zhu <> wrote:
>> (Resending the patch set to include more arch maintainers.)
>> Change the pci_create_bus() interface to pass in available resources to get them
>> settled down early. This is to avoid possible resource conflicts while doing
>> pci_scan_slot() in pci_scan_child_bus(). Note that pcibios_fixup_bus() can get
>> rid of such conflicts, but it's done AFTER scanning slots.
>> In addition, MIPS PCI resources are now fixed using this new interface.
> Jesse, I assume these are headed for the 3.2 merge window, right?

I tried to build on these patches to convert x86 to using the new
pci_create_bus() interface, but I couldn't figure out a nice way to
handle an arbitrary number of resources.

We made pci_create_bus() take a "struct pci_bus_resource *"

struct pci_bus *pci_create_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata,
struct pci_bus_resource *bus_res);

Where pci_bus_resource looks like this:

struct pci_bus_resource {
struct list_head list;
struct resource *res;
unsigned int flags;

Conceptually, we're passing a list of resources to pci_create_bus(),
which I think is the right thing. But I think the best way to do that
is by passing a pointer to a struct list_head, not a pointer to a

If we pass a pci_bus_resource, we're basically using that as a
container for a list (as per include/linux/list.h), but it's not a
well-formed list. Normally a list contains one list_head per element,
plus an extra list_head for the head of the list. There's a nice
drawing on page 296 of

The list built in your MIPS patch (
consists of two pci_bus_resource structs (each with a list_head), but
there's no third list_head for the head of the list. I think if you
tried to use list_for_each_entry() to iterate through the list, it
would not work correctly.

I'll post a slightly modified series to show what I mean. Take a look
and see if it makes sense to you.


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-10 23:07    [W:0.108 / U:1.748 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site