lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: taskstats root only breaking iotop
From
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> I think the question should be: why is it *ever* a good idea to let
> *anybody* read how many bytes anybody has read.

I use iotop to get the throughput of a cp or tar because I don't
always think of piping to 'pv'. People also use it as a progress
indicator for their less verbose applications (total bytes
read/written instead of rate).

I see on forums people use it to find which process is hammering their
disk, though in this case the time spent on I/Os is more useful than
the throughput and this is not broken by these changes assuming they
have root.

> If you want that kind of detail, do "strace". Don't do that abortion
> that is taskstats.

strace is not always appropriate: it's invasive as it slows down the
traced process and it's not aggregating anything.

> Right now, TASKSTATS is a total and utter disaster.

I'm not attached to taskstats, I'd be happy to migrate to what comes next.

> and it's a crazy idea to
> begin with.

But it's not clear to me if you dislike just the taskstats
implementation or the general idea of precise per task I/O stats.

Thanks for taking the time to explain your reasoning, I'm not trying
to resurrect taskstats, just checking if I should expect a brighter
future for iotop.

--
Guillaume


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-02 00:45    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans