Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched: consolidate the name of root_task_group and init_task_group | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Fri, 07 Jan 2011 09:59:14 +0100 |
| |
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 15:17 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote: > Well, I have no bias to either of them. Keeping init_task_group is > just that we can touch less lines. :) > > If you want root_task_group, here it is: > --- > From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com> > Subject: [PATCH] sched: consolidate the name of root_task_group and > init_task_group > > root_task_group is the leftover of USER_SCHED, now it's always > same to init_task_group. > But as Mike suggested, root_task_group is maybe the suitable name > to keep for a tree. > So in this patch: > init_task_group --> root_task_group > init_task_group_load --> root_task_group_load > INIT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD --> ROOT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD > > Suggested-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> > Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
OK, took this one instead..
| |