lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
    From
    On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
    > On 2011-01-07 15:22, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
    >> Hi,
    >>
    >> On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 14:19:33 +0100 Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> wrote:
    >>>
    >>> Hmm, I have pulled-in freshly from linux-2.6-block#for-next after you
    >>> published latest linux-next (next-20110107).
    >>> So, I guessed the (reported) issue is fixed, now.
    >>
    >> No, the commit that caused the warnings was removed when I went back to
    >> using the block tree from next-20110106.  So it will come back unless
    >> fixed.
    >
    > It is fixed in linux-2.6-block#for-next as-of earlier today, so if Sedat
    > pulled from there it should be gone.
    >
    > --
    > Jens Axboe
    >
    >

    I guess 0002 should fix it, its not the case (patch + "big diff" attached).

    - Sedat -

    sd@tbox:~/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37/debian/patches$ LC_ALL=C ls -l
    linux-2.6-block-for-next/
    total 44
    -rw-r--r-- 1 sd sd 5903 Jan 7 10:33
    0001-block-add-internal-hd-part-table-references.patch
    -rw-r--r-- 1 sd sd 2382 Jan 7 10:33
    0002-block-trace-event-block-fix-unassigned-field.patch
    -rw-r--r-- 1 sd sd 3400 Jan 7 10:33
    0003-block-cfq-don-t-use-atomic_t-for-cfq_queue.patch
    -rw-r--r-- 1 sd sd 3387 Jan 7 10:33
    0004-block-cfq-don-t-use-atomic_t-for-cfq_group.patch
    -rw-r--r-- 1 sd sd 403 Jan 7 10:33 Shortlog
    -rw-r--r-- 1 sd sd 527 Jan 7 10:33 diffstat
    -rw-r--r-- 1 sd sd 12797 Jan 7 10:33 linux-2.6-block-for-next.patch
    [unhandled content-type:plain/text][unhandled content-type:plain/text]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-01-07 19:33    [W:0.050 / U:1.452 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site