Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 6 Jan 2011 21:42:49 +0100 | Subject | Re: Signal patchset | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> |
| |
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 14:23, Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com> wrote: > On 15/12/10 20:10, Al Viro wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:15:10PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> >>> Unless someone objects, I'm inclined to apply Al's patchset, as it >>> improves the >>> situation anyway. >>> >>> OK? >> >> FWIW, there's an m68knommu counterpart (ACKed by gerg a while ago). The >> entire bunch is on ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/people/viro/m68k-signals - both m68k >> and m68knommu sets. I don't know how you guys would prefer it done, since
Thx, good the know the nommu part is there, as I don't seem to have it in my mailbox.
>> there's a trivial dependency between m68k and m68knommu parts of series - >> the former has >> +#ifndef __uClinux__ >> +#define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND >> +#endif >> in unistd.h and the latter does >> -#ifndef __uClinux__ >> #define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND >> -#endif >> Both parts switch to generic sys_rt_sigsuspend(), for mmu and nommu resp., >> so they need __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND defined as soon as conversion >> is done. Other than that they are independent. > > I can make sure to send to Linus after Geert. Unless Geert you > want to take and send both the m68k and m68knommu changes?
I can take the m68knommu changes with your ack, too. I'll try to take a look at it tomorrow...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |