Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 6 Jan 2011 15:18:15 +1100 | From | Stephen Rothwell <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the percpu tree |
| |
Hi Tejun,
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 06:13:14 +0100 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:21:05PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the percpu tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c: In function 'intel_thermal_interrupt': > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c:368: error: implicit declaration of function 'this_cpu_has' > > > > Caused by commit 6ac0bb7148b93fb40bccba5dff06d51a3e3ea283 ("x86: use > > this_cpu_has for thermal_interrupt"). > > > > this_cpu_has() does not exist anywhere except in this introduced usage. > > > > I have used the percpu tree from next-20101231 for today. > > My apologies. I forgot an earlier patch to introduce this_cpu_has() > macro. I've reverted the offending commit.
But that revert is not in your published for-next branch yet. I have manually reverted that commit for today. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |