Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:21:59 -0800 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | [020/152] sunrpc: prevent use-after-free on clearing XPT_BUSY |
| |
2.6.36-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
commit ed2849d3ecfa339435818eeff28f6c3424300cec upstream.
When an xprt is created, it has a refcount of 1, and XPT_BUSY is set. The refcount is *not* owned by the thread that created the xprt (as is clear from the fact that creators never put the reference). Rather, it is owned by the absence of XPT_DEAD. Once XPT_DEAD is set, (And XPT_BUSY is clear) that initial reference is dropped and the xprt can be freed.
So when a creator clears XPT_BUSY it is dropping its only reference and so must not touch the xprt again.
However svc_recv, after calling ->xpo_accept (and so getting an XPT_BUSY reference on a new xprt), calls svc_xprt_recieved. This clears XPT_BUSY and then svc_xprt_enqueue - this last without owning a reference. This is dangerous and has been seen to leave svc_xprt_enqueue working with an xprt containing garbage.
So we need to hold an extra counted reference over that call to svc_xprt_received.
For safety, any time we clear XPT_BUSY and then use the xprt again, we first get a reference, and the put it again afterwards.
Note that svc_close_all does not need this extra protection as there are no threads running, and the final free can only be called asynchronously from such a thread.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
--- net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c @@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ int svc_create_xprt(struct svc_serv *ser spin_lock(&svc_xprt_class_lock); list_for_each_entry(xcl, &svc_xprt_class_list, xcl_list) { struct svc_xprt *newxprt; + unsigned short newport; if (strcmp(xprt_name, xcl->xcl_name)) continue; @@ -230,8 +231,9 @@ int svc_create_xprt(struct svc_serv *ser spin_lock_bh(&serv->sv_lock); list_add(&newxprt->xpt_list, &serv->sv_permsocks); spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_lock); + newport = svc_xprt_local_port(newxprt); clear_bit(XPT_BUSY, &newxprt->xpt_flags); - return svc_xprt_local_port(newxprt); + return newport; } err: spin_unlock(&svc_xprt_class_lock); @@ -431,8 +433,13 @@ void svc_xprt_received(struct svc_xprt * { BUG_ON(!test_bit(XPT_BUSY, &xprt->xpt_flags)); xprt->xpt_pool = NULL; + /* As soon as we clear busy, the xprt could be closed and + * 'put', so we need a reference to call svc_xprt_enqueue with: + */ + svc_xprt_get(xprt); clear_bit(XPT_BUSY, &xprt->xpt_flags); svc_xprt_enqueue(xprt); + svc_xprt_put(xprt); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(svc_xprt_received);
| |