Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 5 Jan 2011 13:53:04 +0900 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Change page reference handling semantic of page cache | From | Minchan Kim <> |
| |
Hi Balbir,
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > * MinChan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> [2011-01-03 00:44:29]: > >> Now we increases page reference on add_to_page_cache but doesn't decrease it >> in remove_from_page_cache. Such asymmetric makes confusing about >> page reference so that caller should notice it and comment why they >> release page reference. It's not good API. >> >> Long time ago, Hugh tried it[1] but gave up of reason which >> reiser4's drop_page had to unlock the page between removing it from >> page cache and doing the page_cache_release. But now the situation is >> changed. I think at least things in current mainline doesn't have any >> obstacles. The problem is fs or somethings out of mainline. >> If it has done such thing like reiser4, this patch could be a problem but >> they found it when compile time since we remove remove_from_page_cache. >> >> [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/10/24/140 >> >> The series configuration is following as. >> >> [1/7] : This patch introduces new API delete_from_page_cache. >> [2,3,4,5/7] : Change remove_from_page_cache with delete_from_page_cache. >> Intentionally I divide patch per file since someone might have a concern >> about releasing page reference of delete_from_page_cache in >> somecase (ex, truncate.c) >> [6/7] : Remove old API so out of fs can meet compile error when build time >> and can notice it. >> [7/7] : Change __remove_from_page_cache with __delete_from_page_cache, too. >> In this time, I made all-in-one patch because it doesn't change old behavior >> so it has no concern. Just clean up patch. >> > > Could you please describe any testing done, was it mostly functional?
I didn't test it since I think it's okay as a code review. Do you find any faults or guess it? Anyway, I should have tested it before sending patches.
we are now -rc8 and Andrew doesn't held a patch. So I will test it until he grab a patch.
Thanks,
> > -- > Three Cheers, > Balbir >
-- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |