lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] Provide control over unmapped pages (v4)
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:20:02 -0600 (CST)
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>
> > > > I see it as a tradeoff of when to check? add_to_page_cache or when we
> > > > are want more free memory (due to allocation). It is OK to wakeup
> > > > kswapd while allocating memory, somehow for this purpose (global page
> > > > cache), add_to_page_cache or add_to_page_cache_locked does not seem
> > > > the right place to hook into. I'd be open to comments/suggestions
> > > > though from others as well.
> >
> > I don't like add hook here.
> > AND I don't want to run kswapd because 'kswapd' has been a sign as
> > there are memory shortage. (reusing code is ok.)
> >
> > How about adding new daemon ? Recently, khugepaged, ksmd works for
> > managing memory. Adding one more daemon for special purpose is not
> > very bad, I think. Then, you can do
> > - wake up without hook
> > - throttle its work.
> > - balance the whole system rather than zone.
> > I think per-node balance is enough...
>
>
> I think we already have enough kernel daemons floating around. They are
> multiplying in an amazing way. What would be useful is to map all
> the memory management background stuff into a process. May call this memd
> instead? Perhaps we can fold khugepaged into kswapd as well etc.
>

Making kswapd slow for whis "additional", "requested by user, not by system"
work is good thing ? I think workqueue works enough well, it's scale based on
workloads, if using thread is bad.

Thanks,
-Kame






\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-01-31 01:07    [W:0.061 / U:42.772 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site