[lkml]   [2011]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/7] PowerPC: add unlikely() to BUG_ON()
On 2011年01月28日 18:14, Andreas Schwab Wrote:
> "David Laight"<David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> writes:
>> Also, as (I think) in some of the generated code quoted,
>> use of __builtin_expect() with a boolean expression can
>> force some versions of gcc to generate the integer
>> value of the expression
> That's more likely a side effect of the definition of likely/unlikely:
> they expand to !!(x).

It seems whether or not using unlikely() inside arch implemented BUG_ON() is arch dependent. Maybe a reasonable method
to use BUG_ON() is,
1) do not explicitly use unlikely() when using macro BUG_ON().
2) whether or not using unlikely() inside BUG_ON(), it depends on the implementation of BUG_ON(), including arch

So from current feed back, doing "unlikely() optimization" here doesn't make anything better.

Thanks for all of your feed back :-)

Coly Li
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-01-28 11:39    [W:0.054 / U:2.304 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site