Messages in this thread | | | From | Philip Rakity <> | Date | Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:43:46 -0800 | Subject | Re: A MMC card transfer issue |
| |
There is no good answer.
Doing this patch for 2.6.20 or so a long time ago had problems because some controllers did not work. The failures were equally unpleasant.
The failure you see today is at least not a regression since 1 bit did not work before.
We hope that developers who know their h/w works add the CAP.
On Jan 26, 2011, at 5:31 PM, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
> Hi Philip, > >> which MMC driver are you using. > Could you teach me how to get the information ? > >> you need to have the driver or the low level code enable this QUIRK. > BTW, Is the above permanent treatment? > I think modifying kernel source code isn't preferred. > > Thanks, > ----------------------------------------- > Tomoya MORINAGA > OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Philip Rakity [mailto:prakity@marvell.com] >> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:04 AM >> To: Tomoya MORINAGA >> Cc: Chris Ball; Kyungmin Park; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; >> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >> andrew.chih.howe.khor@intel.com; kok.howg.ewe@intel.com >> Subject: Re: A MMC card transfer issue >> >> >> yes >> >> you need to have the driver or the low level code enable this QUIRK. >> >> which mmc driver are you using. >> >> On Jan 26, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote: >> >>> Hi Philip, >>> >>> On Thursday, January 27, 2011 12:42 AM, Philip Rakity wrote: >>>> Did you define the CAP for BUS WIDTH ? >>>> >>>> MMC_CAP_BUS_WIDTH_TEST >>>> >>>> in the driver or the platform driver ? >>> >>> Let me make the above meaning clear. >>> >>> I don't modify kernel source code "drivers/mmc" at all Is the above >>> mean I must modify something kernel source code ? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> ----------------------------------------- >>> Tomoya MORINAGA >>> OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD. >>> >> >
| |