[lkml]   [2011]   [Jan]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/7] zram/xvmalloc: free bit block insertion optimization
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Robert Jennings <> wrote:
> * Pekka Enberg ( wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Robert Jennings <> wrote:
>> > There is no need to set the bits in the first- and second-level indices
>> > to indicate a free page when we know that a free page existed at this
>> > level.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Robert Jennings <>
>> Why is it not necessary? I don't know that part of the code well
>> enough to tell if this patch is safe or not.
> This change is in a conditional block which is entered only when there is
> an existing data block on the freelist where the insert has taken place.
> The new block is pushed onto the freelist stack and this conditional block
> is updating links in the prior stack head to point to the new stack head.
> After this conditional block the first-/second-level indices are updated
> to indicate that there is a free block at this location.
> This patch adds an immediate return from the conditional block to avoid
> setting bits again to indicate a free block on this freelist. They would
> already be set because there was an existing free block on this freelist.

Some of that information could be put in the changelog.

Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <>

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-01-26 19:53    [W:0.047 / U:6.408 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site