lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jan]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/7] memcg : more fixes and clean up for 2.6.28-rc
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:34:31 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

>
> This is a set of patches which I'm now testing, and it seems it passed
> small test. So I post this.
>
> Some are bug fixes and other are clean ups but I think these are for 2.6.38.
>
> Brief decription
>
> [1/7] remove buggy comment and use better name for mem_cgroup_move_parent()
> The fixes for mem_cgroup_move_parent() is already in mainline, this is
> an add-on.
>
> [2/7] a bug fix for a new function mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(),
> which was recently merged.
>
> [3/7] prepare for fixes in [4/7],[5/7]. This is an enhancement of function
> which is used now.
>
> [4/7] fix mem_cgroup_charge() for THP. By this, memory cgroup's charge function
> will handle THP request in sane way.
>
> [5/7] fix khugepaged scan condition for memcg.
> This is a fix for hang of processes under small/buzy memory cgroup.
>
> [6/7] rename vairable names to be page_size, nr_pages, bytes rather than
> ambiguous names.
>
> [7/7] some memcg function requires the caller to initialize variable
> before call. It's ugly and fix it.
>
>
> I think patch 1,2,3,4,5 is urgent ones. But I think patch "5" needs some
> good review. But without "5", stress-test on small memory cgroup will not
> run succesfully.
>

I'll rebase this set to onto http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=129559263207634&w=2
and post v2.

Thanks,
-Kame



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-01-24 01:37    [W:0.198 / U:4.784 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site