Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:40:42 +0000 | From | Russell King - ARM Linux <> | Subject | Re: Locking in the clk API |
| |
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:16:04PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote: > This suggestion looked promising till I realized that clk_set_rate() > will still be atomic. clk_set_rate() will need to enable/disable the > PLLs depending on which PLLs the rates are derived from. So, the locking > in clk_prepare/unprepare() still has to be atomic since the "slow stuff" > is shared with clk_set_rate().
Who calls clk_set_rate() from an atomic context? Do we know whether anyone does?
| |