[lkml]   [2011]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [2.6.38-rc1] btrfs potential false-positive lockdep report...
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:53:51AM +0700, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> I saw a lockdep report with an instrumented 2.6.38-rc1 kernel [1].
> Checking the code, it looks more likely a false-positive due to the
> lock manipulation to satisfy lockdep, since CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is
> defined.
> Is this the case?

Yeah these pop up every once and a while, its safe to just ignore it. Thanks,


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-01-20 17:15    [W:0.035 / U:27.928 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site