lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Bug in scheduler when using rt_mutex
From
Date
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 08:19 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 14:09 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:35 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> cfs_rq->curr != se is always true.
> > > >
> > > > If that were always true, we'd illegally enqueue a running task.
> > >
> > > I'm sorry that I'm not express myself correctly.
> >
> > Human communication methods are all buggy as hell :)
>
> Not to mention that they are slow, inefficient and ambiguous.
>
> But wht did you expect? The original authors of the code are long gone and
> maintenance is done by newcomers who are patching the code bit by bit. What
> you get from such a development model is pretty predictable: ~1 billion years
> old spaghetti DNA that no-one truly understands.

Gotta give the original authors credit though, their self modifying code
comes equipped with a fully automated hardware break-point debugger.

-Mike



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-01-19 08:43    [W:0.798 / U:1.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site