Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: resume regression in 2.6.37 | From | Sven Neumann <> | Date | Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:04:43 +0100 |
| |
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 13:40 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jan 2011, Sven Neumann wrote: > > > On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 18:33 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > > Without the revert there is absolutely no sign of resume. With the > > > > change reverted I can see that the PXA powers up again, there's an LED > > > > showing that the USB controller has power again. Unfortunately there's > > > > seems to be another problem and the resume doesn't complete. I've tried > > > > to get console output by using no_console_suspend, but there's just > > > > gibberish on the console after resume :( > > > > > > > > Any idea on how to proceed from here? I could perhaps ask our hardware > > > > engineer to try find out where exactly we are stuck in the resume. But > > > > I'd like to avoid that if possible. > > > > > > Can you stick a printk into the set_wake() function of that irq chip > > > and print the irq and on arguments and the return value . Run that > > > with both stock 2.6.37 and the patch reverted. > > > > pxa3xx_set_wake(31, 1) returns 0 > > > > Same result with stock 2.6.37 and the patch reverted. Except that > > without the patch reverted, the device doesn't power up again. > > Ok, can we agree that the patch has no functional impact on the > set_wake function? And I don't see a reason why reverting that patch > results in a working resume. That does not make sense at all. Which > compiler version are you using ?
I agree that this is all very weird and as far as I understand the patch it should have no functional impact. Unfortunately reverting the patch does not result in a working resume, but at least it makes a difference and at the moment it's the only trace I have.
My cross-compile tool-chain uses GCC 4.3.5.
Sven
| |