[lkml]   [2011]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 00/24] Introduce little endian bitops
    2011/1/17 Linus Torvalds <>:
    > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Akinobu Mita <> wrote:
    >> This problem is not touched.
    > So why not? The thing is supposed to be a cleanup, but it generates
    > uglier code and more lines added than removed. Why should I pull
    > something like that?

    Changing *_bit_le() to take "void *" instead of "unsigned long *"
    makes this patch series acceptable?
    Or do we also need to change *_bit_le() to handle unaligned address
    correctly? (i.e. not only long aligned address but also byte aligned

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-01-17 03:39    [W:0.018 / U:82.500 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site