lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 00/24] Introduce little endian bitops
From
2011/1/17 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> This problem is not touched.
>
> So why not? The thing is supposed to be a cleanup, but it generates
> uglier code and more lines added than removed. Why should I pull
> something like that?

Changing *_bit_le() to take "void *" instead of "unsigned long *"
makes this patch series acceptable?
Or do we also need to change *_bit_le() to handle unaligned address
correctly? (i.e. not only long aligned address but also byte aligned
address)


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-01-17 03:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans