Messages in this thread | | | From | Thomas Renninger <> | Subject | Re: perf timechart broken | Date | Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:49:36 +0100 |
| |
On Tuesday 11 January 2011 15:51:34 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:49:51AM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > Em Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:55:36AM +0100, Thomas Renninger escreveu: > > > On Tuesday 11 January 2011 02:36:28 Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > It's too late for .37, but it's fine, we just need to add > > > > a "Cc: stable@kernel.org" tag in the patch for it to be > > > > backported. > > > I'll submit it to stable@ (it wasn't taken because > > > the patch which included the fix wasn't mainline yet and I > > > forgot to submit it for 2.6.37-rcX). > > > > > I can take care of that, but it would be great if someone could look > > > at the issue that perf timechart shows: "no trace data in the file" in > > > x86/tip which seems introduced by one of Arnaldo's latest commits. > > > Reverting some of his latest patches, solved it for me. > > > > Looking at it now. > > Can you try with this patch applied? We need a better way of specifying > ordering of __exit and __init routines :-\ I tested on x86/tip and it is fixed. I explicitly reverted your fix and run into it again.
Thanks!
Thomas
| |