lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: block cache replacement strategy?
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 03:34:29PM +0200, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
>
> during some simple disk read throughput testing I observed
> caching behaviour that doesn't seem right. The machine
> has 2G of RAM and AMD Athlon 4850e, x86_64 kernel but 32bit
> userspace, Linux 2.6.35.4. It seems that contents of the
> block cache are not evicted to make room for other blocks.
> (Or something like that, I have no real clue about this.)
>
> Since this is a rather artificial test I'm not too worried,
> but it looks strange to me so I thought I better report it.

C'mon guys, please comment. Is this a bug or not?
Or is my question too silly?


Johannes

> zzz:~# echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> zzz:~# dd if=/dev/sda2 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1000
> 1000+0 records in
> 1000+0 records out
> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 13.9454 s, 75.2 MB/s
> zzz:~# dd if=/dev/sda2 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1000
> 1000+0 records in
> 1000+0 records out
> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 0.92799 s, 1.1 GB/s
>
> OK, seems like the blocks are cached. But:
>
> zzz:~# dd if=/dev/sda2 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1000 skip=1000
> 1000+0 records in
> 1000+0 records out
> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 13.8375 s, 75.8 MB/s
> zzz:~# dd if=/dev/sda2 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1000 skip=1000
> 1000+0 records in
> 1000+0 records out
> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 13.8429 s, 75.7 MB/s
>
> Even if I let 15min pass and repeat the dd command
> several times, I cannot see any caching effects, it
> stays at ~75 MB/s.
>
> zzz:~# cat /proc/meminfo
> MemTotal: 1793272 kB
> MemFree: 15216 kB
> Buffers: 1378820 kB
> Cached: 20080 kB
> SwapCached: 0 kB
> Active: 792720 kB
> Inactive: 758832 kB
> Active(anon): 91716 kB
> Inactive(anon): 64652 kB
> Active(file): 701004 kB
> Inactive(file): 694180 kB
>
> But then:
>
> zzz:~# dd if=/dev/sda2 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1000
> 1000+0 records in
> 1000+0 records out
> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 5.23983 s, 200 MB/s
> zzz:~# dd if=/dev/sda2 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1000
> 1000+0 records in
> 1000+0 records out
> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 0.908284 s, 1.2 GB/s
>
> zzz:~# cat /proc/meminfo
> MemTotal: 1793272 kB
> MemFree: 16168 kB
> Buffers: 1377308 kB
> Cached: 20660 kB
> SwapCached: 0 kB
> Active: 1140384 kB
> Inactive: 410236 kB
> Active(anon): 91716 kB
> Inactive(anon): 64652 kB
> Active(file): 1048668 kB
> Inactive(file): 345584 kB
>
>
> And finally:
>
> zzz:~# echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> zzz:~# dd if=/dev/sda2 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1000 skip=1000
> 1000+0 records in
> 1000+0 records out
> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 13.948 s, 75.2 MB/s
> zzz:~# dd if=/dev/sda2 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1000 skip=1000
> 1000+0 records in
> 1000+0 records out
> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 0.985031 s, 1.1 GB/s
>
>
> Now these blocks get cached but then the others don't:
>
> zzz:~# dd if=/dev/sda2 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1000
> 1000+0 records in
> 1000+0 records out
> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 13.9394 s, 75.2 MB/s
> zzz:~# dd if=/dev/sda2 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1000
> 1000+0 records in
> 1000+0 records out
> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 13.9403 s, 75.2 MB/s


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-09-09 14:03    [W:0.060 / U:0.512 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site