lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] pio: add arch specific gpio_is_valid() function
> gpio_is_valid determines whether a gpio /can/ be attached to acontroller,

Or more simply: whether its numeric prameter is
a valid argument to gpio_request() and friends.


gpio_request determines whether that gpio
> currently /is/
> attached to a controller.

Of course, "controller" is out of sight of folk
just using GPIOs. Otherwise, that's a fair take
on one set of gpio_request() error reports.


  Part of the confusion seems
> to come at least
> in part from the overlooking of facility for dynamically added gpio numbers.

Maybe, but I think most of it came from folk who
expected "valid" to mean (your terminology) the
GPIO number is now connected to a controller.
(Otherwise $SUBJECT would be meaningless since
there'd be no arch-specific issue.
>
> Fix the documentation to clarify these points.

Patch is forthcoming.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-09-07 19:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans