[lkml]   [2010]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: disabling group leader perf_event
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:57 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<> wrote:
>> As for the intermediate form, you might want to take a look at Dalvik:
>> and probably ParrotVM bytecode too. The thing to avoid is stack-based
>> instructions like in Java bytecode because although it's easy to write
>> interpreters for them, it makes JIT'ing harder (which needs to convert
>> stack-based representation to register-based) and probably doesn't
>> lend itself well to stack-constrained kernel code.
> (offtopic)
> Afaik, NetBSD plan to include lua interpreter in kernel. it is optimized embedded environment.
> (more offtopic)
> in kernel interpreter is needed some concern. 1) restricted stack size (typical userland VM
> often use >100K stack size)  2) restrected memory allocation, especially high order allocation
> often fail. 3) GC often makes unacceptable large lag especially on UP kernel. etc etc
> So, We can't apply rich interpreter (e.g. Dalvik, Parrrot) so easily. I think. personally I prefer
> minimum component.

Yes, we definitely don't want to support memory allocation in the
first stages (if ever). I didn't mean that we should integrate Dalvik
or Parriot but that we should look at their _intermediate code_
("bytecode") as an example what we could design for the kernel.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-09-07 14:17    [W:0.084 / U:16.736 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site