Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 4 Sep 2010 07:05:48 +0900 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/2][BUGFIX] fix memory isolation notifier return value check | From | Hiroyuki Kamezawa <> |
| |
2010/9/4 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>: > On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:57:13 +0900 > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > >> Sorry, the 3rd patch for this set. > > What happened with "[PATCH 2/2] Make is_mem_section_removable more > conformable with offlining code"? You mentioned sending an updated > one, but I can't immediately find it. > Sorry, I couldn't. (and I will not able to do until Monday.)
> Also, please do describe the impact of the problems which are being > fixed. It helps me decide on priority and on > which-kernels-need-the-patch and it helps others when deciding > should-i-backport-this-into-my-kernel. > Ah,yes - Before the patch [2/2], the code is buggy but works. (Because of not-precise test of pre-memory-hotplug.)
IOW, patch [2/2] is not buggy but make the bug be apparent and evenryone will hit this.
Influence is very small and maybe no need for backport.
> I think it'd be best to resend all of this, please. > I'll do in the next week. Sorry for annoying.
Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |