Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Krzysztof Halasa <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 05/10] Fs: ext4: ext4: cleaned up the file with checkpatch.pl | Date | Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:23:25 +0200 |
| |
Tracey Dent <tdent48227@gmail.com> writes:
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h > +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h > @@ -233,8 +233,7 @@ typedef struct ext4_io_end { > /* > * Structure of a blocks group descriptor > */ > -struct ext4_group_desc > -{ > +struct ext4_group_desc { > __le32 bg_block_bitmap_lo; /* Blocks bitmap block */ > __le32 bg_inode_bitmap_lo; /* Inodes bitmap block */
Putting a TAB instead of SPACE before the '{' isn't common here, is it?
> @@ -513,8 +512,8 @@ struct ext4_new_group_data { > #define EXT4_IOC_GROUP_EXTEND _IOW('f', 7, unsigned long) > #define EXT4_IOC_GROUP_ADD _IOW('f', 8, struct ext4_new_group_input) > #define EXT4_IOC_MIGRATE _IO('f', 9) > - /* note ioctl 10 reserved for an early version of the FIEMAP ioctl */ > - /* note ioctl 11 reserved for filesystem-independent FIEMAP ioctl */ > + /* note ioctl 10 reserved for an early version of the FIEMAP ioctl */ > + /* note ioctl 11 reserved for filesystem-independent FIEMAP ioctl */ > #define EXT4_IOC_ALLOC_DA_BLKS _IO('f', 12)
Doesn't look like an improvement to me.
> static inline __le32 ext4_encode_extra_time(struct timespec *time) > { > - return cpu_to_le32((sizeof(time->tv_sec) > 4 ? > - (time->tv_sec >> 32) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK : 0) | > - ((time->tv_nsec << EXT4_EPOCH_BITS) & EXT4_NSEC_MASK)); > + return cpu_to_le32((sizeof(time->tv_sec) > 4 ? > + (time->tv_sec >> 32) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK : 0) | > + ((time->tv_nsec << EXT4_EPOCH_BITS) & EXT4_NSEC_MASK));
Wrong level of indentation.
> static inline void ext4_decode_extra_time(struct timespec *time, __le32 extra) > { > - if (sizeof(time->tv_sec) > 4) > + if (sizeof(time->tv_sec) > 4)
Ditto. -- Krzysztof Halasa
| |