[lkml]   [2010]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 03/11] jump label: Base patch for jump label
    On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 14:40 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:

    > I agree that we this synchronization for the module __init section.
    > However, I believe we are ok for module removal case. free_module() is
    > called *after* blocking_notifier_call_chain() call. The
    > blocking_notifier_call_chain() is going to call back into the jump label
    > code, grab the jump_label_mutex and remove the reference to the module that
    > is about to freed. Thus, the jump label code can no longer reference it.
    > So I think the following patch is all that is required here (lightly
    > tested).
    > Steve, I'll re-post as a separate patch, if we agree on this fix.

    Ug, I'm struggling to get ready for my Tokyo trip. I'll try to look at
    it on the flight. But I still need to write my presentation :-)

    I may have a response back till Monday or Tuesday.

    -- Steve

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-09-27 20:09    [W:4.015 / U:4.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site