lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [GIT] Sparc
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Um, no.  You've *already* called get_signal_to_deliver().  There had been
> no SIGSEGV in sight.  You happily went on to set a sigframe for e.g.
> SIGHUP, but ran out of stack.  At that point you get force_sigsegv()
> from handle_signal().  _NOW_ you have a pending SIGSEGV

Ahh. Ok. Different case from the one I thought you were worried about.
And yeah, I guess that one does require us to mess with the low-level
asm code (although I do wonder if we could not make the whole
do_notify_resume + reschedule code be generic C code - it's a lot of
duplicated subtle asm as it is).

Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-09-22 21:11    [W:1.020 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site