lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] OLPC: extended board revision detection
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:43:07 +0100 (BST)
Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org> wrote:

> Add some functions to easily detect which version of the laptop we are
> running on, and document the board IDs which are accepted by
> olpc_board().
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/olpc.h | 37
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 37
> insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/olpc.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/olpc.h
> index 101229b..9f3219b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/olpc.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/olpc.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,21 @@ extern struct olpc_platform_t olpc_platform_info;
> * and the minor build number withing 0x000f. Pre-builds have a
> minor
> * number less than 8, and normal builds start at 8. For example,
> 0x0B10
> * is a PreB1, and 0x0C18 is a C1.
> + *
> + * History of board IDs that you can pass into this function:
> + * 0xb1 - XO-1 B1
> + * 0xb2 - XO-1 B2
> + * 0xb3 - XO-1 B3
> + * 0xc1 - XO-1 C1
> + * 0xc2 - XO-1 C2
> + * 0xd0 - XO-1.5 A0 and A1 test
> + * 0xd1 - XO-1.5 B1 and B2 test
> + * 0xd2 - XO-1.5 B3 test
> + * 0xd3 - XO-1.5 C1 initial factory build (12/2009)
> + * 0xd4 - XO-1.5 C2 ramp build (02/2010)
> + * 0xd3 - XO-1.5 mass production
> + * 0xd4 - XO-1.5
> + * 0xd5 - XO-1.5
> */
>
> static inline uint32_t olpc_board(uint8_t id)
> @@ -40,6 +55,18 @@ static inline int machine_is_olpc(void)
> return (olpc_platform_info.flags & OLPC_F_PRESENT) ? 1 : 0;
> }
>
> +static inline int machine_is_olpc_xo_1(void)
> +{
> + return machine_is_olpc() &&
> + olpc_platform_info.boardrev < olpc_board_pre(0xd0);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int machine_is_olpc_xo_1_5(void)
> +{
> + return machine_is_olpc() &&
> + olpc_platform_info.boardrev >= olpc_board_pre(0xd0);
> +}
> +


These should be returning bools (ditto for the rest of the patches in
this series). Otherwise, this looks fine to me.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-09-22 20:13    [W:0.049 / U:0.560 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site