lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: -mm: xfs lockdep warning
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:52:27AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Christoph, this implies an inode that has been marked for reclaim
> that has not passed through xfs_fs_evict_inode() after being
> initialised. If it went through the eviction process, the iolock
> would have been re-initialised to a different context. Can you think
> of any path that can get here without going through ->evict? I can't
> off the top of my head...

I think this could happen if the init_inode_always during
re-initialization of an inode in reclaim fails in iget. I have a patch
to add that I'll run through xfsqa. It should only happen very rarely.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-09-20 21:17    [W:0.109 / U:0.888 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site