[lkml]   [2010]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Fix typos
On 09/02/10 12:31, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 16:18, Randy Dunlap <> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'd take most of the corrections in Documentation/, but in general,
>> I don't think that it's a good idea without some careful review.
> I plan to review it if it's indeed worth fixing those typos. I already
> fixed several false positives like "rela" being changed to "real",
> but since it's a 1.8 MB patch I think it's better to ask first before
> making any other review.
>> E.g.:
>> 1. changing thru to through isn't needed IMO.
>> Can you add "thru" to your dictionary?
> Yes, no problem
>> 2.
>> -(Warning, pulses on ACK ar inverted by transistor, irq is rised up on sync
>> +(Warning, pulses on ACK ar inverted by transistor, irq is rose up on sync
> Humn.. indeed this seems to be a bad typo in my dictionary.
>> I'm not so sure about "is rose up" being better. and what about "ar"?
> I'm only changing words with 3 chars or more, because otherwise I
> would have a lot of false positives, but I think I can add this word
> without much trouble.

Mike's suggested change is good here.

>> I saw a few others that I could comment on, but I lost them in the 1.8 MB patch file.
> If you say it's good, I can review it more carefully.

It looks good for Documentation/.

And fixing typos is certainly something that we want to do in
user-visible messages, like printk strings.

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-09-02 22:05    [W:0.093 / U:6.672 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site