Messages in this thread | | | From | Lucas De Marchi <> | Date | Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:31:44 -0300 | Subject | Re: [RFC] Fix typos |
| |
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 16:18, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd take most of the corrections in Documentation/, but in general, > I don't think that it's a good idea without some careful review.
I plan to review it if it's indeed worth fixing those typos. I already fixed several false positives like "rela" being changed to "real", but since it's a 1.8 MB patch I think it's better to ask first before making any other review.
> > E.g.: > > 1. changing thru to through isn't needed IMO. > Can you add "thru" to your dictionary? Yes, no problem
> > 2. > -(Warning, pulses on ACK ar inverted by transistor, irq is rised up on sync > +(Warning, pulses on ACK ar inverted by transistor, irq is rose up on sync > Humn.. indeed this seems to be a bad typo in my dictionary.
> I'm not so sure about "is rose up" being better. and what about "ar"?
I'm only changing words with 3 chars or more, because otherwise I would have a lot of false positives, but I think I can add this word without much trouble.
> > I saw a few others that I could comment on, but I lost them in the 1.8 MB patch file.
If you say it's good, I can review it more carefully.
--
Lucas De Marchi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |