[lkml]   [2010]   [Sep]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove BKL from fs/locks.c
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:28:56AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 September 2010 22:42:03 J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > Looking over the server code.... The only code I see under the BKL is:
> >
> > - a few lease callbacks in fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c, none of which
> > sleep at this point, so all should be fine under a spinlock or
> > whatever we want.
> > - fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:check_for_locks(), which explicitly takes
> > the BKL itself. All it does, though, is walk the lock list
> > for a given file and check whether any of them have a given
> > owner. It would be trivial to put it under some other lock
> > and/or move it to locks.c.
> Ok. In the version of the patch I sent out yesterday, I came to the
> same conclusion and put both of these under lock_flocks(), which
> is still the BKL but can be converted to a spinlock after we have
> sorted out ceph and lockd. If you and others are fine with this patch,
> I'll add it to my bkl/config series.
> Note that walking the i_flock list needs to use lock_flocks()
> (or the BKL), not a private lock. I guess that's what you are saying
> anyway, just making sure.

Yes, that's fine.


 \ /
  Last update: 2010-09-16 16:15    [W:0.028 / U:10.800 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site