[lkml]   [2010]   [Sep]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove BKL from fs/locks.c
    On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:28:56AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
    > On Wednesday 15 September 2010 22:42:03 J. Bruce Fields wrote:
    > > Looking over the server code.... The only code I see under the BKL is:
    > >
    > > - a few lease callbacks in fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c, none of which
    > > sleep at this point, so all should be fine under a spinlock or
    > > whatever we want.
    > > - fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:check_for_locks(), which explicitly takes
    > > the BKL itself. All it does, though, is walk the lock list
    > > for a given file and check whether any of them have a given
    > > owner. It would be trivial to put it under some other lock
    > > and/or move it to locks.c.
    > Ok. In the version of the patch I sent out yesterday, I came to the
    > same conclusion and put both of these under lock_flocks(), which
    > is still the BKL but can be converted to a spinlock after we have
    > sorted out ceph and lockd. If you and others are fine with this patch,
    > I'll add it to my bkl/config series.
    > Note that walking the i_flock list needs to use lock_flocks()
    > (or the BKL), not a private lock. I guess that's what you are saying
    > anyway, just making sure.

    Yes, that's fine.


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-09-16 16:15    [W:0.019 / U:12.332 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site